rabbit anti serping1 antibody (Proteintech)
Structured Review

Rabbit Anti Serping1 Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 17 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti serping1 antibody/product/Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 17 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "β-arrestin1 regulates astrocytic reactivity via Drp1-dependent mitochondrial fission: implications in postoperative delirium."
Article Title: β-arrestin1 regulates astrocytic reactivity via Drp1-dependent mitochondrial fission: implications in postoperative delirium.
Journal: Journal of neuroinflammation
doi: 10.1186/s12974-023-02794-x
Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 3 β-arrestin1 in astrocytes modulates cognitive impairments and astrocytic reactivity in the mouse model for POD. A β-arrestin1 protein levels in brain lysate of WT and β-arrestin1−/− mice. B Experimental protocol and timeline of the POD mouse model. C Representative moving track plots (red curve) of mice in the second trial of Y-maze test. Blue box represents the novel arm. D Time (%) spent in the novel arm in the Y-maze test. E Bouts of novel arm entry in the Y-maze test. F Representative moving track plots (red curve) of mice in the probe trial of Morris water maze test. Black circle represents the invisible platform. G Latency (s) to reach the hidden platform in the probe test of Morris water maze test. H Crossing times in target quadrant in the probe test of Morris water maze test. I Representative immunofluorescent staining of GFAP in the hippocampus. J Analysis of GFAP-positive cell body area in the hippocampus. K Analysis of GFAP-positive cell numbers in the hippocampus. L Heatmap of the expression level of the neurotoxic astrocytes-specific transcripts in the hippocampus. M Expression of C3, Serping1 and Psmb8 in the hippocampus. N Densitometric analysis of C3, Serping1 and Psmb8. O Schematic diagram of the mice model with micro-injection of AAV-siβ-arrestin1 into the hippocampus. P Immunofluorescent co-localization of GFP and GFAP (red) after the AAV micro-injection. Q Representative immunofluorescent staining of GFAP (red) in the hippocampus. R Analysis of astrocytic reactivity by GFAP-positive cell body area and GFAP-positive cell numbers in the hippocampus. S Bouts of novel arm entry in the Y-maze test. T Time (%) spent in the novel arm in the Y-maze test. U Latency (s) to reach the hidden platform in the probe test of Morris water maze test. V Crossing times in target quadrant in the probe test of Morris water maze test. For C-M except for R, data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 vs. the WT-CON group or NC AAV CON group. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 vs. the WT-POD mice or NC AAV POD. For R, data are analyzed by unpaired Student’s t-test. *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001 vs. the NC AAV POD group. n = 6 mice per group for immunofluorescent staining. n = 3 for western blotting. n = 7–10 mice for behavioral tests. Values are presented as means ± SEM
Techniques Used: Staining, Expressing, Microinjection, Western Blot
Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 4 β-arrestin1 deletion aggravates the neurotoxic reactivity of primary astrocytes. A Schematic of the experimental design. B Expression of C3, Serping1 and Psmb8 in the primary astrocytes. C Densitometric analysis of C3, Serping1 and Psmb8. D Heat map of A1 astrocytic genes in primary cell cultures. E Immunofluorescent staining of C3 (green) and GFAP (red) in primary astrocytes. F Immunofluorescent staining of Serping1 (red) and GFAP (green) in primary astrocytes. G Relative co-localized signals of the GFAP-positive and C3-positive immunofluorescent particles between groups. H Relative co-localized signals of the GFAP-positive and Serping1-positive immunofluorescent particles between groups. I Astrocytes were stained with MitoSOX and analyzed by flow cytometry. J JC-1 staining in astrocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry. K Quantification of the mitochondrial ROS in MitoSOX staining. L Quantification of the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential in JC-1 staining measured by flow cytometry. M Oxygen consumption rates were evaluated by Seahorse. N Quantification of oxygen consumption for ATP production, basal respiration and proton leak. O ATP levels in astrocytes. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 vs. the WT CON-MCM group. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 vs. the WT LPS-MCM group. Values are presented as means ± SEM from at least three independent experiments
Techniques Used: Expressing, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Membrane
Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 8 β-arrestin1-biased ligand Carvedilol protects POD mice from pro-inflammatory phenotypes. A Experimental protocol and timeline of the mouse model. B Representative immunofluorescent staining of GFAP in the hippocampus. C Relative GFAP-positive cell body area in the hippocampus. D Relative GFAP-positive cell numbers in the hippocampus. E Heatmap of the expression level of the A1-specific transcripts in hippocampal samples. F Expression of C3, Serping1 and Psmb8 in the hippocampus. G Densitometric analysis of C3, Serping1 and Psmb8. H Representative moving track plots (red curve) of mice in the second trial of Y-maze test. Blue box represents the novel arm. I Time (%) spent in the novel arm in the Y-maze test. J Bouts of novel arm entry in the Y-maze test. K Representative moving track plots (red curve) of mice in the probe trial of Morris water maze test. Black circle represents the invisible platform. L Latency (s) to reach the hidden platform in the probe test of Morris water maze test. M Crossing times in target quadrant in the probe test of Morris water maze test. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s post-hoc test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 vs. the CON group. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.01 vs. the POD group. n = 6 mice per group for immunofluorescent staining. n = 3 for western blotting. n = 10 mice for behavioral tests. Values are presented as means ± SEM
Techniques Used: Staining, Expressing, Western Blot